|MadSci Network: Physics|
Greetings: The proposed system that you ask about is called Solar Power Satellites (SPS) and you will find many references to SPS on the Web. Systems of this sort have been proposed ever since satellites were first orbited in the late 1950s. After 40 years scientists, engineers and politicians are still arguing about the concept. The issues argued about include: How efficient will it be? How much will it cost? How safe will it be? A recent article entitled "Beam It Down: How the New Satellites Can Power the World" ( http://www.techreview.com/articles/oct97/ hoffert.html) by Martin I. Hoffert and Seth D. Potter in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Technical Review Web magazine brings the reader up to date on SPS and also presents a picture of a new concept that they present. To explain the SPS concept I’ll quote a part of the Hoffer & Potter article. START QUOTE: “The skies will soon fill with low-orbiting satellites providing communications links to every point on earth. We should press these fleets into double duty as solar energy collectors that would relay uninterrupted beams of nonpolluting electrical power to earth. In outer space,the sun always shines brightly. clouds never block the solar rays, and there is no night time. Solar collectors mounted on an orbiting satellite would thus generate power 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. If this power could be relayed to earth, then the world's energy problems might be solved forever. Solar power satellites (SPS) were originally proposed as a solution to the oil crises of the 1970s by Czech-American engineer Peter Glaser, then at Arthur D. Little. Glaser imagined 50-square-kilometer arrays of solar cells deployed on satellites orbiting 36,000 kilometers above fixed points along the equator. A satellite at that "geosynchronous" altitude takes 24 hours to orbit the earth and thus remains fixed over the same point on earth all the time. The idea was elegant. Photovoltaic cells on a satellite would convert sunlight into electrical current, which would, in turn, power an onboard microwave generator. The microwave beam would travel through space and the atmosphere. On the ground, an array of rectifying antennas, or "rectennas," would collect these microwaves and extract electrical power, either for local use or for distribution through conventional utility grids. The technology, as originally envisioned, posed daunting technical hurdles. Transferring electrical power efficiently from a satellite in geosynchronous orbit would require a transmitting antenna on board the satellite about one kilometer in diameter and a receiving antenna on the ground about 10 kilometers in diameter. A project of this scale boggles the mind; government funding agencies shied away from investing immense sums in a project whose viability was so unclear. NASA and the Department of Energy, which had sponsored preliminary design studies, lost interest in the late 1970s.” END QUOTE The article then proceeds to discuss a new SPS concept. For cost and safety reasons it would be best to place the large 10 km (6 mile) diameter antennas in remote areas such as the deserts. This would provide low cost land and keep the super powerful microwave beam from injuring people and animals. Other scientists argue that if you place the antennas in the desert why not place the solar cells in the desert and convert the sunlight to electricity on the ground and not use costly satellites and harmful, less efficient microwave beams. However; the power generating solar cells would be useless at night and on cloudy days but you could store excess energy generated during the day in batteries or fly wheels to provide power during darkness. Next February cosmonauts in the MIR Space Station are expected to deploy a Russian space mirror. The 25 meter (82 ft) diameter mirror will reflect sunlight upon a 2.4 km (1.5 mile wide swath on Earth as it circles in low Earth orbit.The goal is to light up northern regions during the long dark winters. Perhaps mirrors of this type could illuminate solarcells at night for generating power. Others have proposed building huge solar energy collector arrays on the moon using lunar materials and then beam the power to earth with very narrow beams from ultrahigh power lasers. As you can see the problem is complex and the cost of the system will play a major part in any decisions made. While oil is as cheap as it is today it will be difficult to justify the cost of an SPS system; however, when the oil reserve begins to end and nuclear generated power becomes a necessity, perhaps the SPS concept will be more cost effective and better for earth’s environment. Read the article and some of the links that are referenced and develop your opinion about Solar Power Satellites! Best regards, Your Mad Scientist Adrian Popa
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.