MadSci Network: Chemistry
Query:

Re: Is there a trend in the P.T. for threshold frequency in photoelectric effec

Date: Thu May 13 14:23:16 1999
Posted By: Dan Berger, Faculty Chemistry/Science, Bluffton College
Area of science: Chemistry
ID: 926450830.Ch
Message:

Is there a trend in the P.T. for threshold frequency in photoelectric effect?

There are trends for reactivity and so on, so is there an obvious trend for the threshold frequency of the elements? Does this trend have any bearing on the threshold frequency of compounds formed by these elements? Lastly, what factors influence the frequency?


The "threshold frequency" to which you refer is commonly known as the work function, symbolized by F in Einstein's equation for the photoelectric effect:

Ek,e = hn - F

F represents the energy required to knock an electron loose, and we would therefore expect any trend to correspond to electronegativities or ionization energies. Remember that E=hn, so that the lower the work function, the lower the frequency of light required to knock an electron loose.

I have prepared a periodic table which shows F, in eV. Compare it with a table of electronegativities, taken from WebElements.

Work 
functions of the elements

Pauling 
electronegativities of the elements

If you compare the two tables, you see that the value of F does tend to follow the Pauling electronegativity (and therefore the first ionization energy, which is pretty obvious). The correlation is not perfect; according to my CRC Handbook, not all the values for F are considered reliable. But the trend seems clear.

Does this trend have any bearing on the threshold frequency of compounds formed by these elements?

I was unable to find a table of values of F for compounds, but I expect that the trend does follow within very large error bars. Coordination compounds (such as Cu · 6H2O) have the electronic energy levels of the metal strongly influenced by the nature of the ligands. But I expect that the work functions of semiconducting compounds, such as GaAs or ZnS, should relate in some straightforward way to the values of F of the component elements. (A cursory glance at the table of semiconductor band-gaps in the CRC Handbook bears this out.)

Lastly, what factors influence the frequency?

As I stated above, it seems intuitively obvious that the most important influence on the value of the work function should be the first ionization energy. Compare the two tables below (the table of ionization enthalpies is from WebElements):

Work 
functions of the elements

First 
ionization enthalpies of the elements

For numerical values of the work function, click here.

  Dan Berger
  Bluffton College
  http://cs.bluffton.edu/~berger


Current Queue | Current Queue for Chemistry | Chemistry archives

Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Chemistry.



MadSci Home | Information | Search | Random Knowledge Generator | MadSci Archives | Mad Library | MAD Labs | MAD FAQs | Ask a ? | Join Us! | Help Support MadSci


MadSci Network, webadmin@www.madsci.org
© 1995-1999. All rights reserved.