MadSci Network: Science History
Query:

Re: What bacteria was first viewed?

Date: Tue Dec 28 20:56:15 1999
Posted By: Samuel Conway, Research Services Manager
Area of science: Science History
ID: 943917033.Sh
Message:

I do not believe that History has recorded exactly which bacterium was seen by Anton von Leewenhoek when he first peered into his microscope and was astonished to find "wee beasties" living on his slide. There is, however, a delightful reproduction of a page from von Leeuwenhoek's notebook on a site maintained by Professor Michael Womack of Macon State College. The picture shows a variety of what we now know as "bacteria" -- perhaps you can identify some of them from the drawing. It can be found at http://www.faculty.mc.peachnet.edu/mwomack/micro.htm

Moderator's Note: In addition, you might check your public library for a copy of the The Microbe Hunters by Paul de Kruif. He tells the story of Anton von Leeuwenhoek and the "animacules" he discovered with his microscope.

--------------
Admin Note:
James Cotton provided an additional answer:

It seems likely that Antony can Leeuwenhoek managed to see bacteria through his primitive microscopes as early as 1683. Other people may have seen bacteria earlier, but Leeuwenhoek^Òs notes are the first record of it. There is an interesting controversy over Leeuwenhoek's claim to have viewed there organisms. For many years it was generally considered theoretically impossible for the primitive microscopes of the 17th century to have resolved organisms as small as bacteria (apparently, an examination paper at Aberdeen University even asked students to explain why this was impossible) but experiments using one of Leeuwenhoek's own microscopes have since shown that he would have been able to obtain tenuous images of bacteria. In a passage from 1676, Leeuwenhoek himself explains that while studying a suspension of pepper grains in water, he saw large protozoa and also some organisms that were "incredibly small, nay, so small in my observations that even if one hundred of these very tiny animals were laid end to end, they could not reach the length of a grain of coarse sand".

Research into other of Leeuwenhoek's writings suggest that organisms were approximately one-thirtieth of an inch, or less than 8m m, and so were bacterial. Later descriptions of them swimming suggest that they were Spirillum or a close relative. The drawings from the 1683 letter show bacteria that may be related to Selenomonas, Spirochaeta and species of Bacillus and Leptothrix.

To see what Leeuwenhoek might have seen of these bacteria through his microscope, visit this page. There is also this web page about the history of microscopy in general.

References

For the full story of Leeuwenhoek's discoveries, try "The Leeuwenhoek Legacy" by Brian J Ford. Biopress and Farand Press, 1991.

You should also found information on Leeuwenhoek in some encyclopaedias.


Current Queue | Current Queue for Science History | Science History archives

Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Science History.



MadSci Home | Information | Search | Random Knowledge Generator | MadSci Archives | Mad Library | MAD Labs | MAD FAQs | Ask a ? | Join Us! | Help Support MadSci


MadSci Network, webadmin@www.madsci.org
© 1995-1999. All rights reserved.