| MadSci Network: Cell Biology |
Dear Louise;
For starters I should say that this is a very good question. The reason
I am saying this is because it does not really have a definitive answer
yet, and although I'm reluctant to try and answer it, I'm more reluctant to
defer the question, so here goes.
At the moment(or at least as far as my references have it) the mechanism
behind calcium chloride affecting cell permeability is unknown - genetic
engineers and scientists know the procedure works purely through empirical
experimentation, (in a sense, a bunch of "what"s -- but no "how" or "why"s)
and therefore have been using it for transfection - or the addition on DNA
to a cell for an added effect (like drug-resistant strains of bacteria, as
an example).
Calcium chloride breaks down into ions in an aqueous(water) solution,
such as a solution the cells are kept in, and the ions create a
transient(temporary) state of "competence", or permeability, in the cell
membrane which allows the small particles like plasmid DNA's and bacterial
DNA's to pass through. The "cold CaCl2" method is used for bacteria like
e. coli, and can be used on mammalian cells also, though Calcium phosphate
is usually used for mammalian cells. Addition of other cations,
detergents, and longer exposure to ions have increased the efficiency of
transfection, but as I said, the mechanism is unknown.
Now, if I had to venture a *guess* as to how it affected the membrane,
and where on the membrane it affected, I would suspect it has something to
do with the Calcium ion pumps in the cell membrane, the electrical
charge across the membrane itself, or both.
The calcium ion pumps - which keep the Ca(+2) levels far lower inside the
cell than outside - could possibly be overwhelmed by such a large presence
of CaCl2. The CaCl2 is added to the cell/bacterial suspension at a very
cold temperature (like in an ice bath) - the cold slowing down the chemical
and cellular reactions at first. The solution is then warmed and the
plasmid DNA is added to the solution while it is being warmed.
This warming helps along and speeds up the chemical reaction of the CaCl2
breaking apart into ions (Ca(+2) and Cl-), and the heat of course helps
these ions bounce around more. The heat also increases the cellular
activity of the bacteria(or mammalian cells).
This overwhelming presence of Ca(2+) outside of the cell, far more than
previous and now in combination with heat and thus faster chemical motion/
reactions will generate intense osmotic pressure between the inside and the
outside of the cell. This osmotic pressure will cause Ca(+2) to be driven
into the cell. This in turn will force the cell to increase the activity
of its Calcium ion pumps to force the calcium ions back out. It is
possible that in this cellular "state of emergency" (since the cell does
not want large amounts of the calcium ion inside of it - it is pretty much
poisonous to the cell in large amounts), that the cell works so hard at
dealing with getting the calcium ions out that other things, such as
plasmid DNA, has a better chance of getting in - either through the pumps
themsleves or just passing through the cell membrane through endocytosis.
As for voltage shifts in the cell membrane, it is possible that at this
time (during heat and excess CaCl2) there could be a voltage change going
on across the cell membrane because of the sudden shift in ion
concentration. This voltage shift could make the cell membrane more
permeable to plasmids, and again, they are merely entering the cell through
endocytosis.
(Voltage shifts in the cell membrane can allow for increased or decreased
permeability, depending on the substance trying to pass through and the
natural state of the cell. In the fertilization process for example, a
voltage shift in the egg once it is fertilized is referred to as the "fast
block" reaction - the cell membrane become far less permeable to the sperm,
thus preventing more sperm from entering into the egg. I believe, though I
don't have the reference handy, that this voltage shift is brought about
by the ion pumps.)
And of course, as I said, it could be a combination of the two of these.
But honestly? No one knows for sure - as I said, at least as far as my
references go - and all of this listed above is based on speculation.
But it definitely is still a good question. I hope I've helped.
- Patti
Sambrook, Fritsch, Maniatis. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual.
Second Edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1989. ISBN: 0-87969-
309-6
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Cell Biology.