### Re: Confusion about relativity and mass

Date: Tue Feb 22 17:46:34 2000
Area of science: Physics
ID: 951106420.Ph
Message:
```
Hello, Judson.

First question first - if an object and its observer were both moving at a
velocity near enough to the speed of light that a noticable mass increase
took place, would the observer detect the change?

No, he wouldn't.  To understand this, let's consider an example that is
happening right now.  The universe is expanding at a very fast rate.  Parts
of it are moving away from us at speeds close to the speed of light.  Let's
consider that the point of reference is on one of those far off points, and
it is the earth that is moving at 99%c compared to it.

From that distant observation post, time on earth has slowed down.  Mass
has increased, and all of the other strange effects associated with
near-light velocities are taking place on the earth right now.  But because
we are at rest relative to our planet, we don't detect any of this.
Instead, we see the far off observation post as shrinking, slowing, and
behaving strangely.

Second question - why does acceleration become more difficult as an object
approaches c, since the object being accelerated seems to be at rest to
itsself?

To understand this question it is necessary to understand a little about
the nature of space and time.  They are not absolutes.  Both can be
contracted by the presence of mass and velocity.  The more massive an
object is, or the faster it is moving, the more time and space are warped
by it.  This is over-simplified, but the main idea holds true.

It is not only the accelerating object that experiences change as it
approaches the speed of light, the very fabric of space and time around
it experiences it, too.  To an observer within the space and time being
affected, the object does not seem harder to accelerate.  To him, it's
standing still, and Newton's laws about motion apply.  It is only to us, on
a observation point outside the space and time in question, that it seems
harder to accelerate.

Think of it this way - if a portion of space shrinks so that what was 10
meters now only takes up 5 meters, then an object accelerating through it
at 1g (10 meters per second, every second) appears to an outside observer
to only have accelerated at half that speed.  To us, the area it traveled
across is only 5 meters.  But the object shrinks to the scale it enters
into, so an observer on the object would think he had traveled a full 10
meters.  Once again, everything in relativity is relative!  It all depends
on where you are when you watch.

For a more in depth answer to these questions, you may find PBS's NOVA
website helpful.  The section on Albert
Einstein has the easiest to understand explaination of relativity I've
ever found.  Another excellent explaination without all the math is the
relativity channel.

Layne Johnson

```

Current Queue | Current Queue for Physics | Physics archives