MadSci Network: Physics |
First, I need to make a correction in what you were reading; your source was either misinformed or out of date. For a while, the liter *was* defined in terms of a mass of water. Which made a difference in about the 6th significant digit between a liter and a cubic decimeter (equivalently, between a milliliter and a cm3). But this ceased to be true in 1964. Since 1964, the liter has been defined as exactly one cubic decimeter. (One still has to watch out for the old definition when looking at precise data from before 1964). With regard to your main question, mass is the black sheep of the measurement standard family, because it is the only one still defined as an "artifact" rather than as something one can get directly from fundamental physics. As you suggest, the mass of the prototype kilogram can drift a tiny bit depending on dust, cleaning and polishing, etc. That is why it is kept in a special vault and only accessed rarely, with well- defined cleaning procedures. But the uncertainty in the artifact due to these factors is around the 8th significant digit, and metrologists would like to do better, both for its own sake and because this uncertainty carries over into other units like electrical units. If something happened to the prototype kilogram, I don't know if there is a specific contingency plan. My guess is that the kilogram would get defined in terms of one of the "lieutenant" kilograms which are compared on occasion with the primary standard and given similar special care. There is work going on to get around this messy dealing with an artifact; people are trying to define a reproducible standard mass that can in principle be realized anywhere rather than sitting in a vault in Paris. One effort involves growing ultrapure silicon crystals and measuring the interatomic distance precisely with X-rays. If they can accurately count how many silicon atoms are there, they will know what the mass is. The second method is called the "Watt balance" where electrical measurements (which can usually be done quite precisely) are used to generate a known force. Neither of these methods has yet been able to match the precision of the prototype kilogram, but a next generation of the Watt balance is coming together which may give the guy in Paris a run for his money. The Watt balance experiment is described at: http://www.eeel.nist.gov/811/elec-kilo.html For more on the definition of fundamental units, see: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/index.html Allan Harvey, Physical and Chemical Properties Division, NIST "Don't blame the government for what I say, or vice versa."
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.