MadSci Network: Physics |
They must have sent this to me because I am at NIST, but I'm far away (both geographically and technically) from that particular experiment. However, it was easy enough for me to look up the details. What I'll do is partially answer some of your specific questions, but also point you to articles where you can find the more detailed information which I could not include in this answer without taking an unreasonable amount of my time. You asked how gravity comes in -- it actually does not cancel out but has to be measured at the location of the experiment. However, this can be done very precisely; the uncertainty in the gravitational force is one of their smaller errors currently. I note that the gravitational constant (proportionality in Newton's law of gravitation) is a fundamental constant which is not known very precisely, but you can still measure gravitational acceleration on Earth very precisely (what is more uncertain is the mass of the Earth). The references I'm about to give you show apparatus details. With regard to your last 2 questions, what the apparatus measures is the balance between the force of gravity on a mass and the force generated electromagnetically between two moving coils. In some sense what is currently being measured is the Watt, though looking at it another way they are measuring drift in the mass of their kilogram weights. As you mention, the electrical standards in some sense have "secondary" status. However, the idea behind much of the project is that some of the electrical aspects (Josephson junctions, etc.) are more precisely reproducible than the artifact mass that defines the kilogram. So the idea would be to redefine the mass in terms of these electrical measurements, making them in some sense primary (much as the meter was redefined in terms of optical measurements). Here's the references which should (along with references therein) give all the information you would ever need (if you don't have access to a library, the contact on that Web page might be willing to mail you copies): P.T. Olsen et al., "Monitoring the mass standard via the comparison of mechanical to electrical power," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 40, 115 (1991). R.L. Steiner et al., "The NIST watt balance: Progress toward monitoring the kilogram," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 46, 601 (1997). R.L. Steiner et al., "A Result from the NIST Watt Balance and an Analysis of Uncertainties," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 48, 205 (1999). B.N. Taylor and P.J. Mohr, "On the redefinition of the kilogram," Metrologia, 36, 63 (1999). Allan Harvey, Physical & Chemical Properties Div., NIST "Don't blame the government for what I say, or vice-versa."
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.