MadSci Network: Physics
Query:

Subject: Why isn't mass considered a dimension?

Date: Tue Aug 22 14:36:31 2000
Posted by Gavin Smith
Grade level: undergrad School: No school entered.
City: Austin State/Province: TX Country: USA
Area of science: Physics
ID: 966969391.Ph
Message:

What is the scientific definition of a dimension and what is it that makes 
length, width, height, and time dimensions, but not mass?  My perception 
of a dimension is that it is a fundamental property by which an object or 
event in our universe can be measured.  By fundamental, I mean that it 
cannot be expressed as the result of other dimensions (i.e. velocity is 
not a dimension because it can be expressed as distance (length, width, 
height) divided by time.  If current string theory calls for 10 
dimensions, is it not possible that some of these dimensions are already 
staring us in the face?  Basically, I'm asking if a dimension is intended 
to describe an object's location in the universe (like the 4 spacetime 
dimensions we're familiar with) or describe the object itself in the 
universe (which could include other fundamental properties as dimensions, 
such as mass).

I read through the archives prior to sending this and the questions I am
asking are not specifically addressed.  I would greatly appreciate it if you
would post this for me.

Thanks!

Gavin Smith             


Response:


Re: Why isn't mass considered a dimension?
What is the scientific definition of a dimension and what is it that makes 
length, width, height, and time dimensions, but not mass?  My perception 
of a dimension is that it is a fundamental property by which an object or 
event in our universe can be measured.  By fundamental, I mean that it 
cannot be expressed as the result of other dimensions (i.e. velocity is 
not a dimension because it can be expressed as distance (length, width, 
height) divided by time.  If current string theory calls for 10 
dimensions, is it not possible that some of these dimensions are already 
staring us in the face?  Basically, I'm asking if a dimension is intended 
to describe an object's location in the universe (like the 4 spacetime 
dimensions we're familiar with) or describe the object itself in the 
universe (which could include other fundamental properties as dimensions, 
such as mass).


_______________________________________________________________
Greetings - Your question was not submitted to the
MAD Scientist Network for the following reason:

A question similar to yours has been answered on our site.

Please try our search engine to locate files:
http://www.madsci.org/MS_search.html

Search on 


Re: Why isn't mass considered a dimension?

Current Queue | Current Queue for Physics | Physics archives

Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.



MadSci Home | Information | Search | Random Knowledge Generator | MadSci Archives | Mad Library | MAD Labs | MAD FAQs | Ask a ? | Join Us! | Help Support MadSci


MadSci Network, webadmin@www.madsci.org
© 1995-2000. All rights reserved.