|MadSci Network: Engineering|
Eew! Tuf one... For one thing, it's barely about wires, it's about "cables", i.e. a bundle containing both conductors. The electrical behaviour of separate wires is quite nondescript as you'll understand from the following. The simplified electrical model of a cable has 4 parameters: *Inductance/length: measure at one end with the other end shorted. Increases as the distance between the wires increases, i.e. the loop area encircled. *Resistance/length: measure with both conductors in series. *Conductivity/length: conductivity of the insulating material. Measure with the cable open on the other end. Likely to be hundreds of megaohms. *Capacitance/length Measure with the cable open at the other end. Increases with increasing outside area of the conductors and with decreasing distance. The resistance of the cable can indeed be reduced ad infinitum by using sufficiently thick conductor gauge. The insulator conductivity can equally be zeroed out by using an insulator material of decent quality. The combination of the capacitance and inductance yields a well-known cable parameter called characteristic impedance, calculated as Zc=SQRT(L/C). In high-frequency applications this is a cable's primary parameter as it determines the required resistance that should be placed at the ends of the cable to exactly absorb an incoming signal without sending part of it ricocheting back to the source. This effect is only noticeable for cables that are long with respect to the signal's wavelength, so any contribution of a cable's characteristic Z to sonic character is highly doubtful. Nevertheless, Zc is often used by cable salespeople to advertise their product. The reasoning goes that loudspeaker loads are "typically" 8 ohms and "normal speaker cable" has a Zc much higher than that. It's easily debunked if one keeps in mind that the output impedance of an amplifier is very low compared to the loudspeaker's input impedance (and rightly so), which itself is in turn highly variable in function of frequency. Otherwise put, the power end of the audio chain by design does not use impedance matching, nor should it. The capacitance of a cable alone is always so low that a normal amplifier wouldn't even notice it. Even a cable with 1nF of capacitance does not detract appreciably from the system bandwidth when the amplifier has a moderately low output impedance. That leaves us with the inductance. A normal cable (2 parallel conductors) can have an inductance of several microHenrys. At 20kHz a 2 microHenry inductance has an impedance of 0.25 Ohms, which is high compared to both the output impedance of the amplifier and to the resistance of the (doubtlessly extremely thick) cable. As such it is the only parameter that has any influence comparable to that of the resistance. Indeed it is quite simple to demonstrate using a square wave source, a good amplifier, 5 yds of cable and a loudspeaker (-like load) that different cables show a different picture on the oscilloscope when measuring on the loudspeaker end. You will find that most "audiophile" cables have some kind of twisted-pair construction. Some of these constructions demonstrably reduce inductance, but always at the expense of increased capacitance. To which extent these effects do anything to the sound is difficult to fathom, keeping into account the loudspeaker's own series resistance which also places itself in the current path and which bluntly swamps out anything as subtle as amplifier output impedance, cable resistances etc. Other effects called into court in the cable argument are cable losses (certain dielectrics show excess resistive losses when subjected to a high frequency voltage) and its dual, skin-effect (excess resistive losses in a conductor when it is subjected to a high-frequency current). Both effects are linear and can be inserted into the simple model by simple addition of extra reactive and resistive elements, which in turn are even smaller than the main elements. You now probably expect me to say that there can be no difference in sound as far as cables are concerned. I'm not going to say that. I've performed enough listening tests, blind and double-blind, to be certain that there are differences (though fairly subtle ones) to be heard. So what I'm saying is that normal "cable science" as outlined above just doesn't cut it. One physicist once told me that science always relies on gross oversimplification of matters and that building a truly accurate behavioral model of something as simple as a cable is almost beyond human capability, so he thought it extremely arrogant of some people to claim that the sonic difference cannot exist, simply based on the common cable model. The hunt for a decent explanation for what I and others are hearing is still open. It is also very clear that no-one (and especially the people who make money selling cables) has a clue as to what is going on. It would only be better if they were just honest and said "I don't know", rather than flooding the place with quack theories that won't help anyone. So, here's one practical advice: just experiment with some other cable in your system and listen if you hear any difference. If you don't, it won't make you happier so don't buy it. If you do, ask yourself if it's worth the money. Hmm. Simple after all... Cheers, Bruno
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Engineering.