|MadSci Network: Astronomy|
By friday, I will be debating as a proponent of WIMPS and Nutrinos being the majority of dark matter in the universe. How might one prove hands down that baryonic particals could not be the answer to obserable galactic movements? Are there any flaws in the theory of Nucleosynthesis that might "nip me in the butt"? Am I right in hering that recently there have been successfull dections of non-baryonic particals.
Re: Why are WIMPS and Nutrinos thought to be the majority of Dark Matter?
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Astronomy.