MadSci Network: Genetics |
Well Kate, I am a Research Assistant Professor of Neurology and I would define a 'designer baby' as the concept of parents having the ability to choose the phenotype of their offspring. Phenotype is defined as the appearance or other characteristics of an organism as a function of its genome and to an extent the interaction of its genome with the environment. The question of if we will have designer babies in the future is difficult to answer because of the broad definition. Through in vitro fertilization, parents already have the ability to determine the sex of their child and this fits a loose definition of 'designer baby'. I suspect in the near future, parents who opt for in vitro fertilization will also be able to scan the embryos genome (perhaps at the four or eight cell stage) for potential genetic diseases and decide if they want to go ahead with implantation into the womb or, if a genetic aberration is detected, discard the embryo and start over. Of course when most people think of designer babies, they think of the ability of the parents to pick their babies eye color, height, intelligence, and other such traits. With the rapid progress of genetics research, it is not inconceivable that this could become a reality in the next century, but we have a long way to go. While we have sequenced the human genome, we haven't deciphered it. Finding and identifying all the individual genes, how their expression is regulated, and how different gene alleles result in different phenotypes are just a few of things that remains to be done, and this will probably take at least 10 times longer to do this than it took to sequence the genome. While technologically we may be able to have fully designed babies in the future, the ethics of should we do it, is and will remain hotly debated. My guess is that most governments will curtail research that directly pertains to making designer babies, much like they have made moratoriums on human cloning. But this will do little other than delay what is probably inevitable. We will continue to study the genome and how genes are regulated and what they do and how they affect an individual because that research has implications for a variety of issues that have nothing to do with designing babies; nevertheless, that knowledge will be able to be used to do just that. In my opinion, the idea of designing babies will be met with disapproval by most people and considered ethically wrong, for a time. However, eventually, more and more people will opt for some type of control over their baby's phenotype and this social more will lessen. In the future, at least some baby designing is inevitable.
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Genetics.