Subject: Is my perception on Gravity correct or not?

I've written a book theorizing the gravity force as the interaction 
between all the hyperfine structured resonances of all the different 
energy and mass particles.  The string theory concludes that the graviton 
is the only single engine particle that generates all these resonaces at 
light speed velocity.  This description helps us to see the graviton 
particle inside the atom!  In Brian Greene's book the Elegant Universe on 
page 43 the lowest level interaction of the atom is a string but it's 
actually the graviton particle!      

Nature has it's own way of showing us this resonace with the thermodynamic 
model of a tornado and the second law of thermodynamics.  "Hot" flows 
to "cold".  Nature's magnetism North Pole "hot" flows to South 
Pole's "cold" while electricity's Positive "hot" flows to 
Negative's "cold" charge.  The atom has a "hot" electron shell and 
a "cold" nuclues.  Even in outer space both the photon and neutrino 
particles were "hotter" than the "cold" graviton light speed particle.  
The thermodynamic perspective is just a model for a very real dynamic.  It 
really is one higher hyperfine structured energy interacting with a lower 
hyperfine structured energy. Those higher structured resonaces do not 
interfere with the lower structured ones.

I have no formal educaton in the sciences nor have I communicated with any 
scientists about this theory. Would someone please comment on my 
perception.    

Re: Is my perception on Gravity correct or not?