MadSci Network: Genetics |
Doru, sorry it took so long to answer your question, but it intrigued me enough to do some additional research. Since other people may be interested in reading this response to your question, let me first relate some background information on cellular aging. When cells are cultured in petri dishes (in vitro) they grow and divide. When they reach confluence (i.e. carpet the bottom of the dish), they are split into separate dishes where they begin to divide again. Each split is known as a passage. In the 1960s Leonard Hayflick observed that fibroblasts grown in such an experiment had a defined number of passages. That is, they could be passaged about 60 times but after that the cells just wouldn't divide any longer; the cells had reached a state of replicative senescence. This became known as the Hayflick limit. The Hayflick limit is cell type specific, which is to say that different types of cells (firbroblast vs. liver cell for example) have different Hayflick limits. Another observation that Hayflick made was that if he took fibroblasts derived from human embryos and fibroblasts from human adults, the cells from the embryos divided many more times than those from the adult. This suggested that replicative senescence might be related to the aging process. Additional evidence for this is found by examining the Hayflick limit of fibroblasts from different species. In general, fibroblasts from species with longer maximum lifespans have larger Hayflick limits. Fibroblasts from rats have an average population doubling (PD - another term for the Hayflick limit) of between 10-20, humans of between 35-70, and Galapagos tortoises of between 100-120. The question remained as to why there are a defined number of divisions for these cells. This is where telomeres come in. Telomeres are the structures that cap the ends of chromosomes and consist of short terminal DNA repeats. It was first suggested in the 1970s that because of the way DNA replicates, during normal replication one strand would be replicated to the end whereas the other strand will have a short gap at the 5' end. In principle, each time the DNA was replicated, the chromosome would shorten progressively from each end, i.e. the length of the telomeres would shorten. This is, indeed the case in many cells types. However, it was also discovered that an enzyme called telomerase acts in certain cells to keep the length of the telomeres constant. The telomerase enzyme was initially found in stem cells, germ cells, and some cancerous cells. The finding of telomerase activity in cancerous cells correlated with the theory that replicative senescence was an evolutionary adaptive anti-cancer mechanism. Both the observations by Hayflick and the observations of telomere shortening resulted in the proposition that telomere length and telomerase activity could be important determinants in an organisms aging - as per your question. During the past several years, this has been a fairly active area of research in the aging community. The findings can be summed up as follows. While in vitro senescence of somatic cells is well documented, many cells in the body (in vivo) do not proliferate enough during the lifetime of the animals to reach their Hayflick limit. Cells that do proliferate regularly have been shown to have telomerase activity or are replaced continuously from stem cells. In addition, there does not appear to be a correlation between telomere length and maximal lifespan of different species. Regardless, it is also important to point out that the variation in cell division over time for each tissue type and the variation in the shortening of the telomeres during each division would make it nearly impossible to predict the lifespan of an individual organism with any accuracy. Having said that, there is some merit in the notion that diseased tissues might have differences in telomere length compared to healthy tissues, which could provide a potential diagnostic tool in the future.
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Genetics.