MadSci Network: Cell Biology |
Dear Nicole, There is nothing bad about embryonic stem (ES) cells, they are likely to be extremely useful for the regeneration of tissues and organs in the next few years. However, there are major ethical issues regarding ES cells because to isolate them requires the destruction of a young (about 3.5 days old) embryo. Therefore the argument against isolation of ES cells is that it requires the death of a person, and the argument for is that these cells are likely to be useful to treat or cure many types of diseases. Both are vaild arguments. Human ES cells have only recently been isolated (1998) and we are only just beginning to understand their biology. Mouse ES cells were isolated in the 1980's and we know a great deal about these cells. However, human ES cells are not the same as mouse ES cells, so a lot of basic research will need to be carried out before we can use them effectively. There are, to my knowledge, only about 10 human ES cell lines available around the world. This is not very many, and at the moment we run the risk of putting all our faith in these few cell lines that may ultimately turn out not to be true ES cells (we do not know what a human ES cell should be like because they haven't been isolated before!). From a scientific point of view we need more ES cells to confirm that we have isolated the right cell type. From an ethical view that would mean the death of hundreds of people. This is what is "bad" about ES cells, both arguments are sound yet ultimately uncompromisable. I hope this helps to answer your question. Only the future knows whether ES cells will be bad or not. Best wishes, Chris Ward
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Cell Biology.