MadSci Network: Chemistry |
Which bonds are truly stronger, ionic or covalent?
Some of my colleagues wish to do a lab in which we heat sugar vs. salt. Of course, the sugar combusts, and the salt doesn't. The explanation we will give is that the ionic bonds of salt are stronger than the covalent sugar-but this confilicts with the fact that salt dissociates in water and sugar doesn't. Please help!! Hooo, boy. You're really comparing apples to oranges here--or maybe the metaphor should be "apples to zebras." Ionic bonds are not "stronger" or "weaker" than covalent bonds. They're just different. You could just as well use freon (CF2Cl2) as an example: it won't burn, so covalent bonds are "as strong as" ionic bonds. What you need to look at is the overall thermodynamics of any reaction, including combustion. In one case, the possible products are less stable than the reactants; in the other, they are more stable.
On the other hand, your second example (dissociation in solution) is a function of ionic compounds as a class but not of covalent ones. Here, ions need to be surrounded by opposite charges to be comfortable, and since water can do that, ionic compounds dissociate in water. Covalent compounds (except for molecular ions like nitrate or phosphate) aren't composed of independent, electrically charged subunits and therefore don't dissociate. But again, this is a matter of thermodynamics! Salt dissolves because it's at least as stable in solution as in the crystal; calcium carbonate doesn't dissolve well because it's more stable in the crystal than in solution. Thermodynamic data used in this answer were taken from the NIST Chemistry WebBook.
|
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Chemistry.