MadSci Network: Cell Biology |
Hi Matthew Hmmm... an interesting and thorny question with no simple answer, however I will try so here goes. Firstly I would say that scientists will have a range of views just like any other group of people, so I can only provide MY opinion. Maybe of more use is the ethical considerations used to formulate an opinion (note that ethics can be defined as 'the systematic study of moral choices' and is therefore not exactly the same as 'morality'). Now, the motivation behind this use of stem cells is in therapeutic cloning in order to clone healthy copies of damaged or malfunctioning tissues as stem cells are capable of developing into many different types of 'self' cell. This would allow transplants without rejection problems, ,and also might solve the problem of shortages of donor organs/tissues - a patient might just have a small piece of themselves cloned and cultured. There have already been attempts to use this new technology with a trial on patients with Parkinson's Disease although the results weren't particularly conclusive other than indicating more work would be needed. So, we have a new technique with the potential to provide significant medical benefits, but of course there are ethical problems, the main two being; 1. It involves killing the embryo. The arguements for and against abortion are well-known and often vociferous, and are relevant here as an embryo is after all a potential person. The problem here is where to draw the line and decide that the embryo is an individual and therefore has the right not to be killed. Is an embryo an individual from the moment of conception? If not, what about at implantation in the uterus (7 days after fertilisation), primitive streak formation (14 days, when the nervous system begins to form), quickening (16 weeks, when autonomous movement begins) or viability outside the womb (22 weeks, the abortion limit in the UK)? Up to 14 days, twinning can still occur and thus the embryo is not biologically a definite individual, but could be more than one. This is however the limit for stem cell experiments - much earlier than for abortion. Why is this, do you think? 2. It is linked to human cloning. This is because, to create the required tissues, an early cloned embryo has to be allowed to divide in vitro, and then used to set up stem cell cultures. The ethical problems are not the same as for cloning a complete individual human, but they do exist, for example (although there are others); a. Cloning produces a high rate of spontaneous abnormalities and many clones fail, leading to a high rate of wastage of embryos - which brings us back to point 1 above. b. Some people consider cloning to be intrinsically wrong for religious or other reasons. Others belive that it is an affront to human dignity to use embryos simply as a source of cells. c. There are unknown risks, including the fact that there are potentially problems with cloned cells being effectively as old as the donor when created (due probably to shortening of telomeres, the end-pieces of chromosomes that stop them unravelling and killing the cell), and so may age prematurely and cause unpredictable medical conditions. So, you can see that this is a complex issue - it is quite possible to see the potential medical benefits but also to have ethical difficulties with one or more of the associated issues. This is why informed bioethical decision-making is so important, if not easy. Personally, I don't like the idea of using embryos as nothing more than a source of cells, plus I perceive technical difficulties with the technology, such as premature cell aging. Then again, I also understand the need for more transplant material as there is always a shortage, especially given the difficulties surrounding tissue rejection. Anyhow, I hope this somewhat complex answer is useful and helps to explain the decision-making process involved in such issues from a scientist's point of view. Yours, Dr David Hubble, UK
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Cell Biology.