Date: Mon Apr 21 23:29:28 2003
Posted By: Steven Levin, Research Scientist, Astrophysics
Area of science: Astronomy
ID: 1049908547.As
Message:
Hi,
First, let's talk briefly about what a quasar is. You can learn more about
this at
Active
Galaxies, but here's a quick sketch: Many galaxies (perhaps nearly all)
appear
to have a very massive black hole at the center. A fraction of these
massive black holes produce energetic jets of material, gushing out in
opposite directions from near the black hole. The energy for this comes
from the gravitational energy of the stuff falling into the black hole. If
one of the two jets of material happens to be pointing in our general
direction, the object looks incredibly bright, and we call it a quasar. If
one of the jets is pointing almost exactly in our direction, the object is
even brighter, and more variable, and we call it a blazar. If neither jet
is pointing close to our direction, the object looks a lot less bright to
us, but still looks different from a normal galaxy, and we call it a Seyfert
galaxy. All 3 of these objects are called AGN, which stands for "Active
Galactic Nuclei", and they're basically different views of the same thing.
Our galaxy (the Milky Way) does have a very massive black hole at its
center, but does not appear to be an AGN now, because there's no evidence
for jets. So your question then becomes, "Is it possible that a long time
ago the black hole in our galaxy did produce jets, even though it doesn't
appear to do so now?" The answer is "Probably not, but we can't really
say for certain." We don't see any evidence of old jets or other activity
which might be related to an AGN in our galaxy, and our Milky Way is a
spiral galaxy while most AGN are elliptical galaxies (although no one is too
sure why), so that makes it less likely. Still, no one understands AGN all
that well yet, and it is possible that what turns a regular galaxy into one
with an AGN is just the amount of material falling into the black hole. If
that's the case, then perhaps a few billion years ago more stuff was falling
into our black hole, and it could have been an AGN. I think a more likely
possibility is that a few billion years from now, after our galaxy
collides with one of its neighbors, it could become an AGN.
Thanks for the interesting question.
-Steve Levin
DISCLAIMER: Just because I work for JPL/NASA/Caltech doesn't mean anything
I say is in any way official. This is just me talking, not NASA, JPL, or
Caltech.
Current Queue |
Current Queue for Astronomy |
Astronomy archives
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Astronomy.
MadSci Home | Information |
Search |
Random Knowledge Generator |
MadSci Archives |
Mad Library | MAD Labs |
MAD FAQs |
Ask a ? |
Join Us! |
Help Support MadSci
MadSci Network,
webadmin@www.madsci.org
© 1995-2003. All rights reserved.