MadSci Network: Earth Sciences |
I think you may be referring to a previous answer that I gave to a K-3 question about the ocean and a tea cup. In that answer, I was trying to avoid some of the more complicated issues, and concentrate on the experience of gravity that we have on Earth. So now is the chance to get to some of the more complicated issues. First, gravity and centripetal force (force towards the centre) are one and the same thing. The two forces to be considered in the situations you describe are gravity and centrifugal force (force of flying from the centre). Centrifugal force does not exist if you are working in an inertial frame of reference. But it is a very real force in our everyday lives where we work in a non-inertial frame of reference. We think of ourselves as stationary, rather than as doing a complicated rolling motion in our course around the sun. (Contrary to the way people usually think of it, the earth does not spin, but rolls -- motion around the earth's axis of rotation is much slower than orbital motion around the sun). Second, most of the questions you ask are not physics type questions. They are neurological questions about how our senses, which are adapted to life on the earth's surface, would adapt to very different environments, and about how our brain would choose to interpret the sensory input. Third, while many of the sorts of situations that interest you can be experimentally simulated (high gravity, low gravity, total weightlessness, locally inconsistent gravity), most of the actual situations are purely thought-experiments. One would not feel right side up or wrong side up on the south pole of a rapidly spinning white dwarf. You would merely feel very sore feet for the millisecond or so before you incinerated! However, the reports of neurological sensation by astronauts who have experienced weightlessness, and by fighter pilots who regularly experience G-forces which vary rapidly both in size and direction, would provide the best experimental evidence about the questions you are asking. Fourth, you ask us to 'Consider a white dwarf w/ diameter of 1/2 city block. ... I doubt that one would feel "right side up" if he were standing at the "south pole". It'd be too small. Or, consider a meteor a few meters long (and smaller...) that is a fragment of a white dwarf (and hence has GREAT density) and is spinning rapidly. However, there would clearly be an "upside down" feeling if one were to step onto the underside of the "rock". ' How are you going to be able to tell which pole of your spinning white dwarf is North or South? And why would you consider the South pole in particular to be the upside down pole? For me, it would be natural to consider the North pole as the upside down pole, since it fits more naturally with my own orientation. How are you going to get your directions to decide which side of your meteor is the top side or the underside. I do not think it at all clear that there would be an upside down feeling. If you would like to discuss this further, it would be nice to find a convenient meteor, and stand on opposite sides to argue it out ;-)
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Earth Sciences.