MadSci Network: Medicine |
Hi Jay note that the incidence of cancer/ cardiovascular disease increases as a power of age; so the older you get, the incidence of cancer/ cv disease increases exponentially under any circumstances. I understand that quitting smoking has no positive or negative effect on your chances of lung cancer; your chances of getting lung cancer just cease to get worse (as they would if you continued to smoke). But this last effect is very clear; the more you smoke, the better your chances of getting cancer. So giving up smoking has clear and tangible benefits. There is obviously some physiological dependence on tobacco- e.g. the withdrawal symptoms of smokers giving up. Nicotine has an effect on cholinergic nerve transmission, and it is a very widespread nerve chemical which the body uses all the time; hence the short-term withdrawal symptoms. However, I am unaware of any other "need" for tobacco smoke chemicals, and I can't imagine why the immune system would be unable to cope. If you consider that smoking is really a chemical assault with nasty chemicals, you are simply removing the exposure to nasty chemicals, and it isn't immediately obvious why that would be bad- quite the opposite. With the immune system, you would clear up the lungs and deposits of tar, with improved circulation, and so I would expect much better immune function in the lungs. If you are interested, there is actually quite a lot of published information on the epidemiology of human smoking, and what happens to cancer incidence when you give up. I am sure you could dig up a review. cheers david
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Medicine.