| MadSci Network: Chemistry |
G'day Nelly, and greetings from the suburbs (we teach this stuff properly at La Trobe! ;-) ) In a textbook, it is said that water that runs downhill will lose the energy and therefore increases the entropy. Your first question is tied up with the word "lose". The first law of thermodynamics says, in effect, that energy is conserved. Whatever energy we start out with is still there at the finish. So we cannot "lose" energy in the sense of the energy disappearing. What really happens is that we "lose" the energy in the sense of mislaying it, or spreading it very thinly around the environment. Another way of looking at the same thing is to regard the water as our "system" and everything else in the environment as the "surroundings", and we can say that energy is lost from the system to the surroundings. Entropy is a measure of the uselessness of energy. A stream of rushing water is useful energy, or low entropy energy. You could use it, for example, to run a flour mill, or a hydroelectric generator. It is useful because all of the water molecules are moving in the same direction. If you took the water molecules from a stream, and gave them the same amount of extra kinetic energy, but in random directions instead of all in the same direction, all that would happen is that the temperature of the water would rise by a fraction of a degree, and there would be no way you could use the energy. Now, suppose that you have water in a high lake flowing into a stream, and eventually arriving at a low lake. Any bit of water that makes this journey has clearly lost potential energy. And once the journey has finished in the lower lake, it does not appear to have gained kinetic energy (or chemical energy, or anything else!). But we know that energy is conserved, so what has happened to the energy? Well, some of it has disappeared into the sound of a rushing stream. Sound is the motion of air molecules that is originally in a coherent wave, but rapidly disperses into a simple tiny heating of the air. As the water rushes down the stream, there is friction between the water and the river bed, and within the water itself (a characteristic of viscous flow). So the water and the riverbed also warm up a little, but much too little to be reliably measured on a thermometer. Finally, when the water arrives in the lower lake, there is originally a current, then a swirl, and then the motion gets randomized. Again it amounts to heating, but only a tiny temperature rise. So the energy is lost -- mislaid or irretrievably dispersed -- even though it is conserved. And that is just what an entropy change means. Also, it is said that decreasing the entropy will result in low solubility. Why? The second law of thermodynamics says that we can never decrease the total entropy. Useful energy can be turned into more useless forms of energy, but useless energy is genuinely useless: you cannot restore it to a more useful form. But that only applies to the total entropy of system plus surroundings. You can decrease the entropy of a system in any process where you consume useful energy to produce an even larger increase in the entropy of the surroundings. Suppose that you have a substance in solution. It has to decide whether it will remain in solution, or whether to separate into crystals of a solid. A solid form af a substance is usually lower both in energy and entropy than its dissolved form. In order for crystals to form, the dissolved form has to have enough extra energy to produce the entropy decrease required. If you can lower the entropy of the dissolved form, then you reduce the size of entropy decrease required, and you make it easier for the solid to be formed. That amounts to a decrease in solubility. A slightly confusing thing about this explanation is that you cannot increase the available energy to drive the entropy decrease simply by warming the solution up. That does increase the energy available in the solution, but it increases the entropy of the solution by an even larger amount. Usually solids are more soluble in warmer solutions, not less soluble.
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Chemistry.