MadSci Network: Molecular Biology |
Hello Justin, This is a very good question that goes right to the heart of much biochemical research. And the answer is: it depends on the kind of inhibition. You could imagine an enzyme as a big lump with very well designed pockets in it. As I’m sure you know, a protein is built by one or more strings of amino-acids that is/are folded very precisely. This is important: it means that if you change the way it folds ever so slightly, the enzyme might not work anymore, or change speed, or do something else. Let’s say that the purpose of our enzyme is to put a phosphate onto a sugar. It would then have a pocket that will fit the unphosphorylated sugar perfectly. Very close to this pocket, it should have another pocket for, for instance, ATP (Adenosine triphosphate). Each binding can have an effect on the structure of the enzyme. Once both have bound, amino-acids in the protein are so placed that a phosphate will be transferred to the sugar, leaving a phosphorylated sugar and an ADP in the pockets. Now these guys don’t fit at all: they will instantly be ejected and replaced by new molecules. And so it goes on, as long as there is sugar and ATP. The cell will need some control: for instance, the enzyme should slow down or stop what it’s doing if there is a lot of ATP in the cell. Typically, our enzyme would have another pocket somewhere else on its surface, which fits ATP. By binding in this pocket, the structure of the enzyme would change so that it becomes less effective or even stops working. The more ATP there is around, the more enzymes will be switched off. Or it could have one position that works as a switch: attach something there and the enzyme, again, shifts its structure and stops working. In comes a Mad Scientist who wants to inhibit the enzyme. He might design a molecule that fits the pocket for the sugar, or the first pocket for ATP, but will not leave it: this would obviously block the reaction. Or he could design a molecule that would bind to the regulatory sites and thus switch the enzyme off. The first kind of inhibition is called ‘competitive’ (competes for the same binding place) and the second could be uncompetitive; there are variants which I will not discuss here. From the above, I’d say chances are slim that one could modify the enzyme so that the competitive inhibition could be relieved as any change would most probably also affect the binding of the sugar that the enzyme is supposed to bind. However, it could be possible to block the uncompetitive inhibition. You would destroy the switch, which might not be a good idea in vivo, but there are uncompetitive inhibitors that do their work without actually using a physiological switch: glyphosate and ‘Round-up Ready’ plants come to mind. Glyphosate is an uncompetitive inhibitor, and plants are made insensitive to glyphosate by exchanging just one amino-acid in a particular enzyme. I hope this answers your question! Erik
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Molecular Biology.