| MadSci Network: General Biology |
Hello, from Idaho.
They say the eyes are the window of the soul. Doctors can tell a lot when
looking into the eyes of their patients. A whole pseudoscience has
developed around this practice, called iridology, the study of the iris as
associated with disease. Dr. Stephen Barret, who runs an
excellent web site on www.quackwatch.com, has called iridology a dubious
practice.
Color changes in the iris begins after birth. For example, most Caucasian
babies have blue eyes and begin to darken as they age, whereby their true
color usually sets in by 6 months. Afro-Americans and some other darker skinned
peoples are born with brown eyes and their eyes remain brown for life. The
pigment in the eyes are due to cells known as melanocytes, and heredity
determines one's eye color. The more melanin, the darker the color. When
these cells are deeper in the eye, the color produced is blue or green,
resulting from the way lightwaves are scattered by the melanocytes. When
they are closer to the surface, the eye is brown. Albinos have eyes that
appear pink, because the melanocytes which ordinarily masks blood vessels,
are lacking.
The reason you've never noted any contrary evidence to the claim that
eating raw food causes the eyes to change color is because this doesn't
happen. If there were such a link, scientists and the general population
would have noticed this connection by now. There is no scientific
evidence that eating any type of diet, raw or otherwise, will change one's
eye color.
A quick perusal of the web quickly elucidates where this claim is coming
from. Practitioners of iridology, naturopathy and 'New Age', are just a
few. There are many claims and anecdotes that's made by members of such
groups, however, they are hard pressed to prove these claims when measured
against rigorous scientific studies.
Many foods are eaten raw, such as fruits, nuts and vegetables. The
Japanese culture eats many raw foods, such as sushi. There are those who
like steak tartare, or savor eating raw oysters, clams or other mollusks,
while others prefer drinking 'raw' milk or downing raw eggs. The problem
with eating raw foods, in general, is a significantly higher risk of food
poisoning from bacteria, which otherwise would be killed by cooking.
Cooking helps break down fiber, carbohydrates and protein, making for
easier digestion and release. It increases the nutritive value of foods,
making them more bioavailable, such as in carrots, spinach and tomatoes,
by releasing greater amounts of carotenoids. It makes food edible that
would otherwise be inedible or unpalatable. It brings out the aroma and
flavor of food, enhancing appetite and contributes to the pleasure of
eating. Although cooking, and especially overcooking, has its drawbacks,
its benefits outweigh the risks. In short, cooking improves one's health.
Indeed, the late Carleton Coon, an American anthropologist and leading
authority on the peoples and cultures of North Africa and the Middle East
wrote, that cooking was "the decisive factor in leading man from a
primarily animal existence into one that was more fully human."
Be careful when reading from the web, and try to search out scientifically
based organizations for more accurate information. I strongly recommend, -
www.quackwatch.com
Hope that helps,
Peter Bosani.
References: The Family Health and Medical Guide - Publisher - Doubleday
Food in History - Author - Tannahill
Food and Nutrition- Life Science Library
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on General Biology.