MadSci Network: Genetics |
Anytime I'm asked a question like this, I get a little nervous just saying, "no". Just a few years ago it would have been unthinkable to have cloned sheep running around Scotland, but here we are. Genetic engineering is almost exclusively envisioned to treat illnesses (for this question, we'll broaden it to "conditions") that involve one or a few genes gone awry. For instance, cystic fibrosis is known to be a defect of one amino acid in one receptor and an astonishing number of genetic illnesses are caused by single small mutations. Introducing a single functioning gene into a person stricken with one of these conditions is difficult, but plausible with viruses and other vector based therapies. To change the genetic gender of a person, a scientist would have to introduce an entire chromosome into a person. The Y chromosome is the smallest in humans but still codes for nearly eighty genes. It is 58 megabases, a HUGE piece of DNA to attempt to introduce into a cell. Beyond that, the number of sex chromosomes is important for genetic integrity. For instance, if a woman was to gain a Y chromosome in an attempt to change her genetic gender, she would be XXY (the new Y chromosome plus the two X chromosomes she was born with). People who are XXY often are stricken with a disease called Klinefelter's disease, which can predispose them to a number of illnesses. Thus, an effective therapy would not only need to introduce the new sex chromosome, but somehow remove the unnecessary chromosome. I will say that, if it were possible to remove an entire chromosome from a cell and reintroduce another, single celled embryos would probably be the only point during development when gender could be reassigned. Even under the best of circumstances during genetic engineering of other organisms (from bacteria to mice), only a subset of cells are ever truly altered. Thus, if traditional genetic engineering approaches used on lab animals were attempted in humans, some cells would be male and some cells would be female. Finally, it is important to understand that while genetics play a huge role in gender assignment, the effect of hormones and other cellular signals during development cannot be ignored. During pregnancy, a fetus is exposed to a great deal of hormones that imprint their effects on the developing child. Many secondary sex traits are irrevocably formed during this time, and there is mounting evidence that this is when the brain is assigned a gender - male or female. Simply changing the chromosomal complement of a person would not change these effects. So, I am going to go out on a limb here and say that, at least for now, gender reassignment on a genetic level is not possible. Billy. I have included some Wikipedia articles here for your reference - caveat, though, that Wikipedia should never be used as a reference in any kind of formal paper. Klinefelter's Syndrome. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klinefelter%27s_syndrome Transformation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_%28genetics%29 Y chromosome. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y_chromosome Sex determination system. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex-determining
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Genetics.