Date: Mon Apr 16 14:48:25 2007
Posted By: Benjamin Monreal, Physics postdoc
Area of science: Physics
ID: 1175820454.Ph
Message:
Hello Yevgeniy,
We have no solid evidence that the laws of nature have changed since the Big
Bang, and no
suggestion that they will change in the future.
It wouldn't take too much of a change to destroy life in the Universe. A
fairly-small change in the constants of the Strong Interaction or the Weak
Interaction, for example, could make stars
burn much more quickly or much more slowly. A change in the electromagnetic
force would
have similar effects, as well as disrupting (for example) the chemistry of
carbon.
There are sort of three classes of experiments which deal with long-term changes
in the laws of
Nature.
- First, one can do very precise laboratory measurements, repeat
them from year
to year, and see if the results change. One such experiment (see
this web page) measured, at the
same time, a certain wavelength of light emitted by a hydrogen atom and that
emitted by a
rubidium atom. If the strong-nuclear force changes over time, it would affect
the rubidium
wavelength but not the hydrogen wavelength. No such effect has been observed
yet (although I
have heard rumors of a new experiment in Germany which may see something; stay
tuned.)
- One can look at the isotopes left over from very old nuclear reactions. The
main example is
a uranium deposit in Gabon, West Africa, under the river Oklo. This deposit is
so uranium-rich
that, two billion years ago, it underwent a "natural" chain-reaction and behaved
as an open-air
nuclear power plant. The unusual isotopes left behind by these reactions are
still there in the
deposit. Several important isotopes are found at Oklo with the same abundances
with which
they are found in modern nuclear reactors; this tells us that the behavior of
these nuclei (i.e., the
cross-section that produces them in the reactor) has not changed in two billion
years.
- You can look at distant stars and galaxies and study absorption and emission
lines in the
light. In some rare cases, you can measure the properties of atoms in the
distant sources; since
the light was emitted so long ago, this tells you something about the laws
governing the atom at
the time the light was emitted. One recent study (see
this paper) claims that the wavelengths emitted by zinc,
chromium, and iron
atoms in 10-billion-year-old quasars are different than those emitted by the
same atoms today,
and that they believe that the electromagnetic force was 0.006% weaker 10
billion years ago.
This result is very controversial, and we hope for it to be either strengthened
and confirmed, or
refuted, by more observations in the upcoming few years.
If this result is true, it's not clear what it means for the future---did the
constants change in the
past and "settle in" to their current value? Or are they changing continuously?
Without a theory,
it's impossible to make predictions or projections. It's also not clear
whether to classify these
changes as "changes in the laws of nature" --- it may just mean that our "laws"
("the speed of
light is constant") were never laws to begin with, but merely pretty-accurate
inferences based on
one-time observations of an underlying phenomenon.
-Ben
Current Queue |
Current Queue for Physics |
Physics archives
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.
MadSci Home | Information |
Search |
Random Knowledge Generator |
MadSci Archives |
Mad Library | MAD Labs |
MAD FAQs |
Ask a ? |
Join Us! |
Help Support MadSci
MadSci Network,
webadmin@madsci.org
© 1995-2006. All rights reserved.