MadSci Network: Physics |
It's important to distinguish the "old quantum theory" -- including the Bohr Model that you seem to be referring to at first -- from a more modern interpretation (using the Schrodinger equation, from which you get 1s orbitals, etc.)
The whole-wave-multiple-per-orbit idea pre-dated the Schrodinger equation, and you are correct: those orbits should never intersect the nucleus. But solving the Schrodinger equation yields a spherically-symmetric solution that is actually peaked at the nucleus! (This is the so-called 1s orbital, or electron "cloud".) So you're right that these two pictures are quite different; the latter one is generally accepted, and the former one has been mostly discarded except as a bridging concept between classical and quantum physics.
That said, there are a few connections that I can note between these two different pictures. Even for the Schrodinger equation solution that corresponds to the 1s orbital/cloud, there is still a "wave" of sorts, because there is an oscillation in time that is normally not mentioned (because it doesn't have any observable consequences; it is just an overall phase). The frequency of this oscillation matches the frequency of the electron wave in the Bohr model. Also, the radius of the n=1 orbital in the Bohr model (known as the Bohr radius) happens to be the most likely measurement of the distance between the electron and the proton in a Hydrogen atom.
Finally, for your last question, those solutions only represent 1 electron, not 2. As soon as you have 2 electrons (say, in the Helium atom), the Schrodinger equation becomes impossible to solve exactly, because of the interactions between the two electrons.
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.