MadSci Network: Physics |
If the Pauli Exclusion Principle stops similar particles occupying the same location why don't we classify it as a fundamental force? For example, the PEP seems to provide the pressure needed to stop a Neutron star from collapsing but I'm not clear that any of the standard 4 fundamental forces accounts for this force. Yet I thought the fundamental forces should account, ultimately, for all forces. Or have I misunderstood what's happening when the PEP stops particles getting too close? Many thanks.
Re: Why isn't the Pauli Exclusion Principle a fundamental force?
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.