MadSci Network: Physics |
This question goes to the heart of the interpretation of quantum mechanics (that is, what does quantum mechanics mean). There are many answers to this question, and an enormous amount of discussion; the reason for this is that questions of interpretation are metaphysical, and cannot be answered by experiment. Can you simulate the measurement process itself? Yes, but not without introducing assumptions about it. Will the result of your simulation tell you anything that you didn't introduce through your assumptions (either deliberately or inadvertantly)? No, I don't believe that it will. Can quantum mechanics be considered a complete theory without a description of the measurement process? This is a question of philosoply more than physics, and whether one answers yes or no depends on how one defines a complete theory. Indeed, whether or not the wave function collapses is basically a matter of interpretation rather than something that can be measured directly (it is clear that after a measurement the system has a different set of expectation values, but how you interpret that is exactly that - an interpretation). There is a wealth of literature on this subject; a good starting point (even though it is incomplete) is the Measurement in quantum mechanics FAQ, which can be found at http://www.mtnmath.com/faq/meas-qm.html#toc12 . It contains many references. Personally, I find the discussion in Park's "Introduction to the Quantum Theory" (3rd edition, McGraw-Hill 1992) to be particularly lucid (it is Chapter 10 in this edition).
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.