MadSci Network: Physics |
Hi If you are in a 'rotating' reference frame the force feels real enough. Viewed from the outside, most problems dealing with rotation can be solved in an inertial frame, i.e. non-accelerating/rotating. This schema has no need of a concept like centrifugal force. The motion can be explained using Newton's laws. Remember that 'real' depends on your motives. There is no such thing as 'gravitational force' in General Relativity because gravity is more accurately described as distortions in spacetime, not as a force. I suppose the answer I would give to such a straight question is 'no, it doesn't exist' because it can be artificially generated in the equations of motion by transforming to a non-inertial coordinate system. A 'real' force like electromagnetism has no such analogue except for a gauge transformation (don't ask) but such a transformation is an abstract, mathematical one, not one which we can directly experience like getting on a merry-go-round. Just remember that 'forces' are just a language for describing nature which was widely spoken in the classical era. Post- relativity and QM we choose to use other languages (fields, transformations). What matters is whether the language is a fruitful one. If you're trying to solve a problem of a man standing inside a rotating box and kicking a football, the 'centrifugal force' is a very helpful tool for getting out the right answer. However, if the ball goes outside the box into a non-rotating room, it is an unnecessary complication and we just use 'straight' mechanics. Hope this helps. Cheers, Max
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.