MadSci Network: Physics |
Greetings:
You have asked a number of interesting interrelated questions. My answers are for typical human vision and typical optical components; however, there are special cases where my answers could be 50 % low or 50% high (+/- 50%). The text book that I am referring to is :
F. A. Jenkins and H. E. White; Fundamentals of Optics, McGraw-Hill, New York.Before you procede with this discussion you may want to review my answer to a question about how a magnifying glass works at the following MAD SCIENCE archives location:
Physics : RE: Why does an image turns upside down in a mag. glass? Adrian Popa, Staff Optical/Microwave Physics, Wed Nov 20 11:39:48 1996
We measure the resolution of an optical system, including human eyes, by the angular difference between two points of light that we can just resolve. At angles less than the resolution angle the points of light appear to be one bigger or brighter point. Scientists call these points of light POINT SOURCES and they can be double stars many millions of miles away or man made point sources in the laboratory. A number of double stars with different angular separation have been cataloged and amateur astronomers often use them to measure the resolution of their telescopes. An excellent point source of light which can be easily moved around the laboratory is light emitted from the end of an optical fiber. Special optical fibers called SINGLE MODE FIBERS have light guiding glass cores that are only one light wavelength in diameter making them excellent point sources of light at the fundamental limit of resolution.
http://www.yorku.ca/research/vision/eye/
An object and it's image can be considered to be composed of a large number of points of light which more recently have been called PIXELS (picture elements). This image formed at the primary focus by the objective determines the number of pixels in the image. The pixels can be magnifyed for viewing but the total number of pixels cannot be increased by magnification. This is similar to a television picture which is composed of 525 horizontal lines and about 250 vertical lines (525 x 250 = 131,250 pixels). The large screen television projections used in sports stadiums have about the same number of pixels as you home TV set (i.e the same resolution) only they are larger for more distant viewing.
The optical elements discussed above determine the following key parameters of the optical instrument:
The equations shown above illustrate that short focal length objectives and short focal length primary mirrors and larger diameter objectives give greater angular resolution, wider fields of view, less depth of focus; however, the greater curvatures required for short focal length optics give more distortion and are more expensive to manufacture.
Long focal length objectives have less curvature, give greater magnification, have greater depth of focus, have less distortion and are less costly to manufacture.
Larger diameter objectives or mirrors gather more light for night vision or dim distant objects in space, give greater angular resolution, have less depth of focus and cost more to manufacture.
Therefore all of these parameters must be optimized together for the specific application that the optical instrument will be used for and for an affordable cost. I will not discuss depth of focus, image distortion or chromatic (color) aberration here, but these are also major issues in optical instrument design.
This water anology is similar to optical diffraction, light appears to bend around the edges of objects and propagates into the shadow region, only now the waves take on a spherical shape in three dimensions rather than a planar wave on the water surface. Diffraction also occurs during the converging of focused light waves, spreading some light waves into the shadowed region and smearing the resolution of images at the focal point to values greater than the one wavelength fundamental limit. This diffraction pattern in the focal region consists of a bright central disk, known as AIRY'S DISK, surrounded by a number of fainter rings.
http://marie.mit.edu/~bruen/airy.html
Neither the disk or the rings are sharply limited but shade gradually off at the edges, being seperated by circles of zero intensity.
FIGURE Airy's disks for two different diameters of apertures. The aperture used for the images on the right side are about double the diameter of the aperture used to form the images on the left side. This demonstrates that the larger apertures on the right give smaller, higher resolution images.
The top set of images are of single point souces. The middle images show two point sources just resolved. The bottom images show two point sources completely resolvedA large number of tutorials on optics can be found on the Newport Corporations web pages at:
o http://www.newport.com/Optics/175050/1033/catalog.aspx
Also try:
http://www.mellesgriot.com/products/optics/opticaltutorial.asp
http://www.hypermaths.org/quadibloc/science/opt0501.htm
Surprisingly, atmosphereic bluring causes a one meter diameter objective to provide the highest astronomical resolution possible when located on the earth's surface! The larger mirrors, such as the 5 meter Hale Telescope simply gather more light to view dim, distant objects at the edge of the universe, but the larger size does not improve resolution over a one meter diameter mirror. The new Keck telescopes are using active computer controlled, moveable, seqmented, primary mirrors to remove atmospheric bluring. This new technique, which is revolutioning astronomy, is discussed on the following Web pages where you can tour the great telescopes of the world. Here you will find that human observers are no longer used, being replaced by more sensitive electronic cameras.
http://astro.caltech.edu/
http://tarkus.pha.jhu.edu/~rbrunner/bookmarks/scienceHotList.html
Details of the Hubble Space Telescope, which does not have the atmosphere to limit it's resolution, can be found at:
In the technical description you'll find the Hubble's primary mirror to be 2.4 meters (94.5 inches) in diameter and the focal length to be 24 meters (79 ft.). Using equation 1 we get a limit of resolution = 10 wavelengths. The measured angular resolution published on the web pages is very close to the theoretical limit given by equation 2. This resolution is far better than old style earth bound telescopes.
Regards and good viewing, your Mad Scientist,
Adrian Popa
___
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.