MadSci Network: General Biology |
Hi Gigi. The subject of giving drugs to animals is a very emotional subject. Since the invention of the database, information about the actions of drugs is readily available so tests on animals never need to be repeated. Final drug substances are never tested on animals, especially since the Thalidomide affair of the 70's in the UK. In the Thalidomide case, the drug was given to primates and passed with 100% results. On being given to humans, the results were catastrophic. "Thalidomide babies" were born with major defects. This affair changed the face of drug testing overnight. Drugs are tested in human volunteers in three stages prior to launch. During the first stage, the drug's effects on the human metabolism are monitored. During the later stages. the drug's effectiveness is examined. In the first stage testing all the subjects are, as I said, Volunteers. In the other later stages, the subjects are sufferers of the particular disease being treated. The big question these days, is the use of final drug substances on sick children. Many Doctors administer smaller doses of a drug to a child, taking the view that you can give a proportionally smaller dose to a child and it is more likely to be safe. Thankfully, in most cases this appears to be true. Therefore, clinical testing needs to be done to check the effects of the drugs on the metabolism of healthy kids. BUT, what mother is going to give permission to feed drug substances to her child? So you see, in a case like this, giving the drug to an animal would not help anyway.
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on General Biology.