MadSci Network: Evolution |
Basically, I would have to say yes. I'm not certain if 1000 years is enough time, but I think there would be a change in skin color. Typically, people with a lot of melanin in their skin, such as those of African descent, are well adapted to living in areas where the amount of sunlight is high enough to damage the skin cells. The melanin forms a shield around the delicate cellular structures, particularly the chromosomes, and prevents them from being damaged by the ultraviolet radiation. In a way, it is a natural sunblock. Anthropologists think that as peopled moved further north, especially into Europe, that the need for all that melanin was not as great. A lot of energy is used by a body to produce all the that melanin. If it is not needed, then those individuals' genes did not code for melanin would tend to live longer and healthier lives and probably have more offspring. After many generations, it is possible to go from a dark race to a light race. Also, there may have been another drive to 'whiteness': nutrition. Another idea is that in Northern Europe, there may have been problems with vitamin deficiency. But, some vitamins can be synthesized by the body if it is in contact with sunlight. All the melanin would have gotten in the way, so there may have been a selective advantage to not having melanin. Of course, an argument against darker people evolving into lighter people could be sexual selection. If our group of dark skinned people did not find light skinned people attractive, then we may never get lighter skinned people. It wouldn't matter who is better adapted to survive in the environment because the lighter skinned people would have a harder time finding mates and producing more offspring. Sexual selection can often put a kink into natural selection.
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Evolution.