MadSci Network: Physics |
Hi Marissa, It's good to see your interest in physics, your experiment is showing very good thinking, you have correctly assumed that if the bottle is tightly closed and the amount of oxygen changes, the water must experience the force and move accordingly. All this things, so far, are correct. But there is more. There are at least two problems with the way you are measuring pressure. The first problem is that you are assuming the loss of oxygen as the only factor, when the production of carbon dioxide and monoxide are also there. As you probably know, combustion is a chemical reaction where a fuel is broken down by oxigen, and there are byproducts, mostly carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. So, without doing the math, I don't know if the pressure is going to go up because of the production of those two gases, or go down because the candle uses up the available oxigen. Certainly, the net effect is the result of the individual pressures of each gas combined. Perhaps your can settle this matter once you figure out a way to make your experiment work. So I am gonna try to help you make it work. Your experiment will only measure the NET pressure effect. The second, and most important problem, is that water is not an easily compressible fluid. Compressible means squeezable, compliant. Because water is not compressible when a force pushes on a water volume, the volume changes very little (practically nothing) for a given force. You would need to measure very tiny changes (almost invisible) or have incredibly large forces acting on the water. From your experiment results, I suppose the pressure change is not that enormous to change water volume. So, even though, in fact when the air pressure changes, the water experiences a force either pushing or pulling on it, the force has little effect on the volume of the water (is just like pushing on a concrete wall and trying to measure the displacement, you are doing things right (at least in principle), but it will move very little to see the difference) It will move a tiny bit though. If you push with something stronger like a big monster truck...well.. better not try that! Air, for instance is compressible, you can squeeze an air balloon, or if you take an empty soda bottle (its really full of air) and put the cap back on it (tight), you can still squeeze it. Try that with water instead! its so hard it barely moves! If its half full of water, its somewhat easier to push on. Perhaps if a small amount of air could be placed inside your water... that might just work! The trick is to put ALL of the air separate from the candle's oxigen supply, and completely under the water, so that the pressure can still be SEEN as a change in water level. This air cavity can be called a "bladder". A bladder full of air, like this, is a cavity that can change its volume, while the pressure inside it changes very little. Here is something you can try to add to your experiment to increase how far the water moves for a given change in pressure. In your water jar, submerge under the water a small balloon. Inflate the balloon with some air, just enough so its not limp, but not so much that it does not fit completely under the water. Also, tie something very heavy (perhaps a small metal object like a metal bolt or fishing weight) to the balloon to prevent it from floating. Remember that air is very light and it will try to float back up. You may even have to GLUE the balloon's "tie rope" to the bottom of the jar with very good waterproof glue from the hardware store. Avoid white glue or the super glue. Also, wait for it to dry, the floating force (buoyant force) will pull too hard on it) Now, here is what happens: your water is still not compressible, but the air inside the balloon submerged under the water is compressible, as you can see from the soda bottle experiment. Water that has an air balloon inside is compressible because you are really squeezing the balloon, the water is just there to help push. So, when your candle finishes the oxigen (and finishes producing its carbon byproducts) the change in pressure will be more visible because the balloon is being squeezed (or pulled) by that change. With this "modified" version of your experiment, the role of water is: 1. To make the floating candle "float" 2. To transmit the force of the pressure change to the balloon. The study of how water can be used to "transmit" forces is hydraulics. Your jar is a hydraulic system. Yet, another variation on your experiment can be made by drilling a hole on the lid for the jar, then glue with silicon based glue a straw that goes down into the water in vertical position. You still want to keep the lid airtight, and the straw better be a good quality hard straw, not the cheap soft ones. Try the Wendys or McDonalds one, not the ones from Burger King :) If you find a straw that lets you see the water inside it, all the better. When pressure pushes on the water, it will try to push the water "out" of the bottle" via the straw... Only, it will not push that hard to drive the water out, just enough to move a bit up or down the straw. This is just like the ballon idea, but instead of a small air volume in the water, your straw makes sure the pressure in the bottle remains at atmospheric pressure. In essence, the whole atmosphere has become the balloon! With the candle, as oxigen gets used up (and other gases produced) the volume will change just like with the balloon idea. Without a candle, the straw jar trick makes a neat barometer. Leave it closed very airtight for some days, and see what happens as the weather changes. Fortunately, its barometric abilities will not interfere with your candle experiment because weather does not change that fast. Were the atmospheric pressure to change in a few seconds, just when your candle burns, that could interfere, but that's nearly impossible. You can do the *same* experiment 5 or 10 times and compare the results just to make sure. You could even make the balloon jar and the straw jar and see side by side. I bet the jar with the straw shows the most difference in water level. Try to find out why... Good luck and keep up the good work! your mad scientist, Aurelio R. Ramos
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.