Re: Re: An old query on truss bridges

Date: Mon May 30 13:50:39 2005
Posted By: C.H. 'Chas' Hague, PE SE, Senior Project Engineer
Area of science: Engineering
ID: 1115082671.Eg
Message:
```
Hello, Christina!
Every year, I attend the awards ceremony for the bridge building contests
run by the Illinois Institute of Technology.  Some of the bridges these
kids have made are fantastic -- a few grams of wood supporting 60-70
kilos!  Many of the winners were girls, too.
But they've been building bridges all semester, and your class is just
doing this for fun at the end of the year.  So, a "crash" course in how
bridges work:
First, like you said, a bridge is a machine that takes a load from where
it is and puts it somewhere else, that is, out at the ends.  A bridge with
no supports under the roadway is called a "simple" bridge.
All bridges work by "compression" and "tension" in their members,
compression being when the material is being pushed together, and tension
being when it's pulled apart.  A piece of string under load is in tension;
a stack of blocks held horizontally is in compression.
The loads on an arch bridge are pretty much uniform all the way across.
http://www.technologystudent.com/struct1/arch1.htm  (the bottom picture
is not an arch bridge!) http://members.cox.net/ksregphotos/Clements_Stone_Arch_Bridgel.html
This puts the entire arch in compression.  If the load is applied in the
center only, the shoulders of the arch (with nothing to hold them down)
will flex upwards and fail.
If the load is placed only in the center of the span, the best supporting
structure would be what's called a kingpost
truss.http://www.mnhs.org/places/nationalregister/bridges/nrrk1482/sign.htm
l
(Also see drawing)  The two diagonal members are in compression; the
horizontal member is in tension, keeping the bottom end of the diagonals
from flying out.
Now the thing with compression members is that they fail by buckling.
Push down (carefully) on one of your wood pieces.  At some point, it will
bow sideways.  Try this with a long and a shorter piece, and you will see
that the longer the member is, the smaller the load it can support before
it bows.  And, due to the geometery of the triangle, the more acute the
angle between the strut and the load vector is, the less load there will
be on the strut -- that is, a strut supporting a load at 45 degrees will
have to work harder to support it than when the load is at 30 degrees.
So there's the design problem:  The longer the compression struts, the
more acute the angle between them and the load, so the less load on each
strut.  But, the longer they are, the more likely they are to buckle.
Adding bracing from the bottom chord to the struts reduces what engineers
call the unbraced length, but it adds weight to the truss.
I shouldn't make an out-and-out recommendation as to what kind of bridge
you should build. But, the simplest structure would be a kingpost truss in
the form of a four-sided triangle, with the load applied at the apex, two
long horizontals spanning the gap, and the other two sides the width of
the "roadway."  The angle of the struts to the bottom chord should be on
the order of 45 to 60 degrees.  Use bracing struts to reduce the unbraced
length of the compression members. One more bit of advice:  be very
careful in making your joints.  That is the most likely point of failure.
When you and your friends break your bridges,  I strongly recommend that
you not only record the weight of the bridge and how much load it
carried.  Also record the location and type of failure that each bridge
experienced.  Then, you can build another bridge with the broken part
strengthened and other parts lightened.  Load that one, and see where the
new version breaks.  Keep trying, and you may end up with a bridge the
equal of the design contest prizewinners!

Good Luck!
C.H. "Chas" Hague, PE SE

```

Current Queue | Current Queue for Engineering | Engineering archives