| MadSci Network: Physics |
When a question includes the phrase, "is it possible" , the answer is usually a qualified "yes". If your question is whether your cosmology is to be preferred over other suggestions, the answer is a qualified "maybe". Unlike most other branches of science, cosmology is not easily set up in the lab. The true test over time is not even so much whether an idea is "true" as whether it is accepted in light of other things that are accepted. If your idea predicts something that has not yet been observed, that would be a big boost. If you can explain an observation that is accepted but deemed "impossible" by other cosmologies, that would be a big boost. I'm just not sure that you have scored on either of those two accounts so that leaves you with just another set of postulates. Would yours be more likely to be used? ... that depends on whether people find yours to be a more simple, easier to understand theory. If not, new theories are usually ignored because they do not benefit anyone by adopting something new. Today, the trend is to increase the number of dimensions and not to think of anything as having only two.
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Physics.