|MadSci Network: Genetics|
My question is why don't people in the science community inform the civilization of the fact that when you have multiple males and females in the society the breeding habit is promiscuity altering this has repercussions. Like other multiple male, female social organisms all of the young's survival is still ensured, but without the circulation of dominate traits from the dominate males and females being the most distributed. people become increasing less masculine and feminine and all together less fit. similar to the effects of inbreeding, but opposite outbreeding if you will, which I believe has some of the same effects such as less muscle and bone density, mental disorders in which you see in a lot of Europeans that have had alternative breeding habits and polygamous as well. The instinct for everyone's survival to be ensured breeding but now with less and less robust and dominate traits from the alphas which should be the majority in circulation. this behavior is not seen in tribal people untouched by civilization, We have been altered in these metropolises from our natural habitus of promiscuity like which still exists in societies that are untouched by more modern civilization and in our closest ancestor the chimpanzee. In chimpanzees(promiscuous) similar to us dominate traits from dominate males, females passed more frequently and all offspring's future is secured. Do you now see why I think this is a problem for us to live in multi male multi female societies without being strictly promiscuous like chimpanzees? In natural selection of monogamous creatures inviable young simply wouldn't survive. This also leads to homosexual tendency no longer being tendencies, but replacing male, female reproduction in that having dwindled masc., fem. traits.
Re: repercussion of alternate breeding paterns (revised)
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Genetics.