MadSci Network: Virology |
You know, I never thought about this one before! And unfortunately, the answer is that I that I really can't say for sure. The rabies virus is a mammalian-specific virus. It only infects mammals, but as best as I am aware it can infect all mammals, from bats to man. The exact mechanism or reason for this pattern of infectivity of is not totally clear, though. There is simply a lot we do not understand about how the virus actually establishes an infection in an animal, and therefore why some might be susceptible and some not. It is clear that the virus propagates in muscle and then is transmitted from neuron to neuron until reaching and infecting the brain, and it is fairly well accepted that it does this at least in part by interacting with the acteylcholine receptor that is on these cell types. But the story is clearly more complicated, since studies in the tissue culture dish do not accurately reflect the cell-specific nature of the rabies virus infection. In other words, the cell-specificity or "tropism" of the rabies virus seems to depend on factors only present in the whole animal, which makes them difficult to predict and/or study. A further complication is that the outcome of infection is not the same for all species. The infection is very aggressive in dogs, for example, while a person may have a latent (quiet) phase for years, while bats seem to live a normal life-span even with rabies infection. Whales are most certainly mammals, since they bear live young, etc. etc. So, I would suppose that they would be infected by the rabies virus. But I know of no direct evidence to support or refute this. You seem to suggest that seals and walruses are known to carry the rabies virus. Is this conjecture, or has this been shown?? If you know of rabies infection of seals and walruses, you know more about this than I do! In my searches on this topic, the best I could find was a study that looked at viruses isolated from sea mammals (seals, I think). They did find a rabies-like virus in the animals, but it was not rabies itself. For both sea mammals (e.g. whales) and sea/land mammals (e.g. seals) we must finally consider how they might get infected. The predominant way to be infected would be through the bite of a rabid animal. The second way, and far less common, would be to eat an infected animal. In any infection route, though, the virus must get into tissues to cause an infection - "casual contact" won’t do it. Since the most common rabies reservoirs are dogs, bats, skunks, raccoons, coyotes, etc, I think it would be very unlikely that even a seal or walrus would ever get infected (but there may be something I don’t know about this!). And even if they did, it is not at all clear to me how they would further transmit the virus to plankton-sucking whales.
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Virology.