Re: Subject: Red Shift and Planck's equation
Area: Astronomy
Posted By: Jim Moskowitz, Museum Educator
Date: Fri Mar 21 17:17:34 1997
Message ID: 857626151.As
That's a great question. I wasn't sure of the answer myself, so I turned around
and tried another internet answering service, Sten Odenwald's
Ask An Astronomer,
at http://www2.ari.net/home/odenwald/qadir/qanda.html
He replied:
The universe's total energy is constant.
You can think of this energy as being transferred from kinetic
into gravitational potential energy. For an infinite but 'flat'
universe with Omega = 1.000, this transfer will be complete so
that after an eternity, the energy will be totally in gravitational
potential energy. For an infinite but 'hyperbolic' universe,
there will still be a slight amount of kinetic energy left over
after eternity. As for the cosmic background radiation, its energy
remains the same, its just that the peak of its energy slides
from gamma-ray energies to longer and longer wavelengths as the
universe gets older.
Which at first confirmed my intial suspicion, that there was a kinetic/
potential interchange taking place. but I don't believe the background
radiation is somehow exempt from this like he states in the final sentence.
I don't believe it's possible for the photons to shift in wavelength
yet still retain the same total energy, unless their numbers somehow
increase, which I see no mechanism for. So I think I'd stick with his
first four sentences, and give the fifth a miss.
Hopefully helpfully,
Jim Moskowitz
The Franklin Institute
Current Queue |
Current Queue for Astronomy |
Astronomy archives
Return to the MadSci Network
MadSci Home | Information |
Search |
Random Knowledge Generator |
MadSci Archives |
Mad Library | MAD Labs |
MAD FAQs |
Ask a ? |
Join Us! |
Help Support MadSci
MadSci Network
© 1997, Washington University Medical School
webadmin@www.madsci.org