| MadSci Network: Science History |
I recently read a journal article* that spurred my curiosity. The
author stated, "Individuals often hold a simplistic, hierarchical view of
the relationship between theories and laws whereby theories become laws
depending on the availibility of supporting evidence." He added, "theories
and laws are different kinds of knowledge and one can not develop or be
transformed into the other" and, "theories are as legitimate a product of
science as laws."
Throughout my years of undergraduate and graduate education, I have
been taught this "hierarchical view" of theories and laws. As a former
biology professor and current teacher of secondary education, I need to
know, "What is the difference between a theory and a law?" and more
importantly, CAN a theory eventually become a law based on supporting
evidence? I need these questions answered in order to produce
"scientifically literate" citizens, I would surley hate to continue
misleading my students.
*Lederman, N.G. 1998. The state of science education: subject matter
without context. The Electronic Journal of Science. 3(2).
Re: What is the difference between a theory and a law?
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Science History.