MadSci Network: Botany |
Your question is not easy to answer because plants are so diverse in their seed dispersal methods. There are also several methods for dispersing seeds, and many plants use more than one method. Some plants use wind, water, gravity, attach their hooked fruits or sticky seeds to animals to hitch a ride, or launch them. So it would not be necessary for such fruits/seeds to be edible although some are, such as the water-dispersed coconut. It costs a plant energy to synthesize poisonous or bad-tasting compounds, termed secondary compounds, to make fruits or seeds poisonous or bad-tasting. Therefore, it may give the plant an advantage not to have to synthesize so many secondary compounds. In evolutionary terms, if a fruit was very tasty and seeds easily digested, and there is a large animal population, all the fruit and seeds might be eaten and the plant would not be able to reproduce by seed. In that case, any mutation that made fruit or seeds inedible could be very beneficial. However, animals would probably not eat all the seeds every year. So even if all the seeds are eaten some years, it still could be successful seed dispersal if the plant was a long-lived tree, and if once every few years, some seeds survived and sprouted. That may be enough to successfully propagate and spread a long-lived species. In the other extreme, if a fruit and seed was very poisonous, you might expect no animals would disperse its seeds by eating them. That means a mutation to make fruit edible could be an advantage. However, there are always some animals that may mistakenly eat even poisonous fruit/seed. Alternately, the species could rely on seed disperal methods that did not require animals to eat the fruit. They might also rely mainly on vegetative propagation, which is very important in the plant kingdom. The plants you mention, rice, wheat, walnut, carrot and potato, have been selected for hundreds or thousands of years for larger and more tasty fruits or edible parts. Wild carrots, for example, have much smaller storage roots that are not nearly as tasty as cultivated carrots. In many cases, selecting for better taste means selecting fruits, seeds or edible plants parts with fewer secondary compounds. One thing to remember is that fruits or seeds that are poisonous or bad tasting to people are not all poisonous or bad tasting to animals. For example, the "hot" capsaicin in wild pepper does not deter birds from eating them even though mammals have adverse reactions to capsaicin. Seeds are dispersed in a great variety of ways, so it is often better to consider specific examples. Walnuts in the Eastern USA rely largely on squirrels who carry away the walnuts and bury them. The squirrels either forget where some are buried or let them buried too long, and they sprout. Blue jays are considered very important dispersers of oak acorns over long distances (over 1 km). It works in these cases even though the seeds are edible because so many seeds are produced that the animals either can't eat all the stored seeds before they sprout or forget where they stored some of them. Many plants have coevolved with animals which disperse their fruits or seeds. For example, seeds of several USA wildflowers have an elaiosome, an external area high in proteins or fats, that serve as food for ants, which disperse the seeds. References Plant Secondary Compounds Seed Dispersal by blue jays Seed dispersal of wild chiltepin peppers More seed dispersal methods: Ants Ant Seed Dispersal Drift Seeds And Drift Fruits: Seeds That Ride The Ocean Currents Blowing In The Wind: Seeds & Fruits Dispersed By Wind Ultimate And Painful Hitchhikers
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Botany.