MadSci Network: Chemistry
Query:

Re: differences between van der waals forces and hydrogen bonds

Date: Thu Jun 18 11:03:07 1998
Posted By: ZIA KHAN, Staff, CHEMISTRY, Dept.Chemistry
Area of science: Chemistry
ID: 895434082.Ch
Message:

I am explaining The differrence in much detail  giving examples as 
well.Please let me know if you have further  enquiry.   

van der Waals forces
   Relatively weak  electric forces that attract neutral molecules 
to one another in gases, in  liquefied and solidified gases, and in almost 
all organic liquids and solids.  The forces are named for the 
Dutch physicist Johannes van der  Waals,  who in 1873 first postulated 
these intermolecular forces in developing a  theory to account for the 
properties of real gases. Solids that are held  together by van der Waals 
forces characteristically have lower melting points  and are softer than 
those held togetherby the stronger ionic, covalent, and  metallic bonds. 
 
Van der Waals forces may arise from three  sources. 

First, the molecules of 
some materials,although electrically  neutral, may be permanent electric 
dipoles. Because of fixed distortion  in the distribution of  
electric charge in the very structure of some  molecules, one side of 
a molecule is always somewhat positive and the  opposite side somewhat 
negative. The tendency of such permanent dipoles to  align with each other 
results in a net attractive force. 

Second, the presence  of molecules that 
are permanent dipoles temporarily distorts the electron charge  in 
other nearby polar or nonpolar molecules, thereby inducing further  
polarization. An additional attractive force results from the interaction of  
a permanent dipole with a neighbouring induced dipole. 

Third,even though no  
molecules of a material are permanent dipoles (e.g., in the noble gas argon 
or  the organic liquid benzene), a force of attraction exists between the  
molecules, accounting for condensing to the liquid state at sufficiently low  
temperatures.  The nature of the attractive force in molecules,  which 
requires quantum mechanics for its correct description, was first  
recognized (1930) by the Polish-born physicist Fritz  London, who  
traced it to electron motion within molecules. London pointed out that at 
any  instant the centre of negative charge of the electrons and the centre 
of  positive charge of the atomic nuclei would not be likely to coincide. 
Thus,  the fluctuation of electrons makes molecules time-varying dipoles, 
even though  the average of this instantaneous polarization over a brief 
time interval may  be zero. Such time-varying dipoles, or instantaneous 
dipoles, cannot orient  themselves into alignment to account for the 
actual force of attraction, but  they do induce properly aligned 
polarization in adjacent molecules, resulting  in attractive forces. These 
specific interactions, or forces, arising from  electron fluctuations in 
molecules (known as  London forces, or  dispersion forces) are present 
even between permanently polar molecules and  produce, generally, the 
largest of the three contributions to intermolecular  forces.   

The hydrogen  bond.  

The  interactions described so far are not  limited 
to molecules of any specific composition. However, there is one important 
intermolecular interaction specific to molecules containing an oxygen, 
nitrogen, or fluorine atom that is attached to a  hydrogen 
atom. This interaction is the hydrogen bond, an interaction of the form 
A - H - B, where A and B are atoms of any of the three elements  mentioned 
above and the hydrogen atom lies on a straight line between the nuclei of A 
and B. A hydrogen bond is about 10 times as strong as the other  
interactions described above,and when present it dominates all other types  
of intermolecular interaction. It is responsible, for example, for the  
existence of water as a liquid at normal temperatures; because of its  
low molar mass, water would be expected to be a gas. The hydrogen bond is  
also responsible for the existence as solids of many organic molecules  
containing hydroxyl groups (-OH); the sugars glucose and sucrose are  
examples.  

Many interpretations of the hydrogen bond have  been proposed. 
One that fits into the general scheme of this article is to  think of the A-
H unit as being composed of an A atomic orbital and a hydrogen  1s orbital 
and to consider a lone pair of electrons on B as occupying a B  
orbital. When the three atoms are aligned, these three orbitals can form  
three molecular orbitals: one bonding, one largely non-bonding, and one  
anti-bonding There are four electrons to accommodate (two from the original  
A-H bond and two from the lone pair). They occupy the bonding and non-bonding  
orbitals, leaving the anti-bonding orbital vacant. Hence, the net effect is  
to lower the energy of the AHB grouping and thus to constitute an  
intermolecular bond. Once again, on encountering the hydrogen bond, one  
encounters a twist in the conventional attitude; the question raised by this  
interpretation is not why such a bond occurs but why it does not occur more  
generally. The explanation lies in the small size of the hydrogen atom, 
which  enables the balance of energies in the molecular orbital scheme to be  
favourable to bonding.  Hydrogen bonding occurs to atoms other than  
nitrogen, oxygen, and fluorine if they carry a negative charge and hence are  
rich in readily available electrons. Thus, hydrogen bonding is one of the  
principal mechanisms of  hydration of anions in aqueous solution (the  
bonding of H O molecules to the solute species) and hence contributes to the  
ability of water to act as a good solvent for ionic compounds. It also  
contributes to the hydration of organic compounds containing oxygen  
or nitrogen atoms and thus accounts for the much greater aqueous solubility  
of alcohols than hydrocarbons.     

Hydrogen bonds are of great significance 
in determining  the  structure of biologically significant compounds, most 
notably proteins and deoxyribonucleic acid  (DNA). An important 
feature of the structure of proteins (which are polypeptides, or 
polymers formed from amino acids) is  the  existence of the  peptide 
link, the group -CO-NH-,which  appears between each pair of adjacent 
amino acids. This  link  provides an NH group that can form a hydrogen bond 
to a suitable acceptor atom and an oxygen atom, which can act as a  
suitable receptor. Therefore, a peptide link provides the  two  essential 
ingredients of a hydrogen bond.      

Corey, who formulated a set of rules, 
the  Pauling-Corey  rules, for its implementation. The implication of these 
rules is  the  existence of two types of structure for a polypeptide, which  
is  either a helical form (the  helix) or a pleated sheet form (the    
pleated sheet). All polypeptides have one structure or the other and 
often have alternating regions of each. Since the  properties and 
behaviour of an enzyme molecule (a particular class  of  polypeptides) are 
determined by its shape and, in particular, by the shape of the region 
where the molecule it acts on needs  to  attach, it follows that hydrogen 
bonds are centrally important to the functions of life.  Hydrogen bonds 
are also responsible for the transmission of genetic information from 
one generation to another, for they are responsible for the specific keying 
together of cytosine with guanine and  thymine with adenine moieties that 
characterizes the structure of the DNA double helix.  

Zia  Khan   




Current Queue | Current Queue for Chemistry | Chemistry archives

Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Chemistry.



MadSci Home | Information | Search | Random Knowledge Generator | MadSci Archives | Mad Library | MAD Labs | MAD FAQs | Ask a ? | Join Us! | Help Support MadSci


MadSci Network, webadmin@www.madsci.org
© 1995-1998. All rights reserved.