MadSci Network: Chemistry |
The commonly accepted value of electronegativity for Fluroine (as accepted in most textbooks and sources I've run across) is 4.00, which is what Pauling DECIDED. The value of 3.98 is probably derived from the Allred-Rochow tabulation or the Mulliken Electronegativity scale.Pauling is the first chemist, I believe, to actual quantify electronegativey values. He ASSIGNED Fluorine a value of 4.0 and was able to scale all the other elements by measuring and deriving electronegativity differences. I don't believe there was an absolute scale to work with. He had to experimentally determine electronegativity differences and arbitrarily assign the biggest baddest electron gobbler, fluorine a value. The discrepency between Pauling's 4.0 and other scales' use of 3.98 is probably due to the fact that Pauling calculated electronegativety values from a rather complicted wave funtion analysis which I won't go into here (I'm not even sure I completly understand it myself !). The other scales tend to use simple functions based of ionization potential and/or electron affinity and there is probably some sources of error with the values in IP and EA. In any case, an electronegativity value difference of .02 is not enough to cause any doubt in what type of bonds would form. Fluorine very much wants to form highly ionic bonds and a difference of .02 is not going to change the character of the bond. Here are some more detailed links; http://www.umich.edu/~chem302/lecturesummary/200summaries_BH/electronegativ ity.html http://dbhs.wvusd.k12.ca.us/Bonding/Electroneg-development.html
Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Chemistry.